MIT Technology Review Gaslights Conservatives for Concern Over Riots

News & Politics

Conservative journalists who post videos of riots are the problem, not the riots. That’s the word from a professor at Harvard Kennedy’s prominent Shorenstein Center. 

Joan Donovan, director of the Technology and Social Change Research Project at the center,  blamed conservatives for being the real source of America’s modern violence. Her September 3 op-ed ran in the MIT Technology Review specifically targeted “right-wing adversarial media-makers like Elijah Schaffer and Andy Ngo.”

Her piece, “How an overload of riot porn is driving conflict in the streets,” condemned conservatives for using social media as a “machine to spread a narrative of lawless rioting.” Donovan smeared the uptick in use of video to condemn the violence of rioters as “the rise of riot porn.”

The Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy touts itself as being dedicated to “exploring and illuminating the intersection of press, politics and public policy in theory and practice.” Its Advisory Board appears to be a Who’s Who of liberal and Big Tech power players from Snapchat’s Peter Hamby to Washington Post writer Eugene Scott and former Washington Post writer Maralee Schwartz. Other notable members include ABC News Vice President of Public Affairs Robin Sproul, ProPublica President Richard Tofel, and Linda Wertheimer of NPR. Its Faculty and Staff are divided among clearly politicized divisions ranging from the “Technology and Social Change Project” to the “Institutional Anti-Racism and Accountability Project,” without a clear free speech or diversity of thought-related initiative in sight.

You Might Like

It’s no surprise that Donovan herself appears to be a strictly left-wing partisan in her appraisal of online discourse.

She called for social media companies to “work actively to prevent militias and vigilante groups from staging these armed standoffs” against rioters and specified that this “includes shutting down event pages” and “removing the accounts of those who are calling for physical violence.” She made no mention of how Facebook has allowed allegedly violent Antifa groups to remain online.

Indeed, in early September she had referred to Antifa organizations as a ”boogeyman” brought on by conservatives as a red herring:

“Prediction: Mainstream mean is about to pivot hard to describing ‘boogaloos’ as alt-right 2.0 in order to counter the antifa boogeyman. 

“All of it means less airtime for the real concerns of Black Americans protesting police violence and systematic racism.”

This had been only a few days after Aaron “Jay” Danielson, “was shot in downtown Portland on Aug. 29, as supporters of President Trump and of the Black Lives Matter movement clashed in the city,” Fox News summarized. The same article noted that “On Thursday, federal law enforcement officers investigating Danielson’s death fatally shot Michael Forest Reinoehl, 48, an avowed supporter of Antifa.”

Donovan complained that “right-wing media makers have recorded and circulated videos of violent altercations at protests in cities,” which in turn has “mobilized white militia and vigilante groups to take up arms against Black Lives Matter and ‘antifa’ protesters.” Donovan added that this has established a “self-fulfilling cycle where white vigilantes feel justified in menacing and physically attacking racial justice protesters—and inspire others to do the same.”

“Because right-wing reactionaries do not have the same kind of experience in organizing street protests as the left, they instead rely heavily on social media—particularly Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter—to mobilize crowds,” Donovan theorized. 

In true liberal gaslighting fashion, Donovan smeared journalists for reporting on far-left violence:

“These narratives have been intensified and supplemented by the work of right-wing adversarial media-makers like Elijah Schaffer and Andy Ngo, who collect videos of conflict at public protests and recirculate them to their online audiences.”

She made no mention of how independent journalist Andy Ngo was allegedly beaten to the point of reportedly suffering brain injury from Antifa activists, a fact even The Post acknowledged in a caption to its photo: “Unidentified Rose City Antifa members beat up Andy Ngo, an independent journalist.”

Conservatives are under attack. Contact the FCC at 1-888-225-5322 and/or via the MRC’s FCC contact form to give your take on the petition filed by the Department of Commerce regarding Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on “hate speech” and equal footing for conservatives.

Articles You May Like

Georgia will conduct another presidential vote recount despite already officially certifying results
Unbelievable: Cuomo says he’s inviting his 89-year-old mother to Thanksgiving dinner; Update: Cuomo cancels
Judge Rules Residents Of Minneapolis Can Sue The City Over Reduction In Number Of Police
Trump Pardons Michael Flynn, Former National Security Adviser
NO VAX, NO FLY: Qantas airline to make Covid-19 vaccination mandatory for international travel

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *