HHS Rule Would Have Prohibited Discrimination Against Babies with Disabilities


Working until the last minute, the Office of Civil Rights in the Department of Health and Human Services has published a proposed rule that would protect babies born prematurely from death — including those who survive abortion — and disabled people generally from discrimination in the health-care context. From the OCR press release:

The proposed rule…updates and clarifies existing Departmental regulations to conform with statutory protections against disability discrimination, and establishes that HHS’ regulations:

  • Protect patients, including infants born alive whose parents or guardians consent to treatment, from disability discrimination…;

  • Protect patients, including infants born alive, from unlawful denials of emergency screening or stabilizing treatment…;

  • Prohibit disability discrimination in the provision or withdrawal of life-saving or life-sustaining care;

  • Prohibit covered providers from basing certain life and death medical decisions on evaluations of the relative worth of the life of a patient with a disability, or on stereotypes or bias with respect to disability;

  • Prohibit covered providers from exerting undue influence or steering patients toward the withdrawal of life-saving or life-sustaining care, or toward the provision of life-ending services such as assisted suicide, mercy killing, or euthanasia, on the basis of disability; and

  • Require hospitals to inform a patient or the patient’s legal representative if and when a “do not resuscitate order” is entered for the patient without consent under facility regulations.

Too late! There is zero chance in hell that the Biden administration will finalize this proposal. Indeed, if anything, under the culture-of-death zealot, HHS secretary nominee Xavier Becerra, expect public policy to go in exactly the opposite direction.

I know many are relieved at the pending conclusion of the Trump chaos. But I wonder whether the babies and people with disabilities who will now not be saved — but could have been with this rule in place — would take a different view.

Articles You May Like

New York mom ARRESTED after son shows school nurse his new tattoo
The RNC Chair Election Will Tell Us How Serious the GOP Is About Winning Again
Elon Musk calls New York Times ‘lobbying firm for far-left politicians’ after paper apparently ran no story about ‘The Twitter Files’
The Washington Post tied Elon Musk to a ‘Diet Coke cult’?
HOLODOMOR 2023: Media sounds alarm over shooter sabotage of power substation in North Carolina; says nothing about government sabotage of food, farms, fertilizer and fuel

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *