Originalism Does Not Need a Makeover



ewsweek opinion editor Josh Hammer argues at Public Discourse that conservatives should replace originalism with a new, refined judicial philosophy named “common-good originalism.” Hammer is a sharp guy, and one assumes that his is the best argument that could be made for this proposal. His argument is, however, unspecific in its critiques, vague in its proposals, unmoored from constitutional legitimacy, and unsound as strategy. That suggests that the problem is not the messenger, but the message.

Briefly defined, originalism is the idea that when a law is passed, it means what it is understood to mean at the time it receives …

Articles You May Like

Dr. Fauci says there won’t be a federal mandate for vaccine passports
Wyoming Governor Signs Bill that Requires Voter ID at Polling Station
A Democratic Operative’s View of Cancel Culture
Chauvin Prosecutors Have Answered One Big Question
No, We Can’t Just Blame Political Violence on Our Enemies or Pretend It Doesn’t Exist

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *