This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—May 16

Federal district judge Jack B. Weinstein

2011—In United States v. C.R., senior federal district judge Jack B. Weinstein issues a 349-page opinion (with an additional 50+ pages of appendices) holding that the Eighth Amendment prohibits applying the statutory minimum five-year term of imprisonment to a youthful defendant who pleaded guilty to one count of distributing child pornography. Here’s how criminal-procedure expert Orin Kerr prefaces his discussion of the ruling:

“There are a lot of debates about ‘judicial activism’ in which some question whether the term has real meaning. Fortunately, there is always Jack Weinstein, whose activism is so over-the-top that it easily quiets the debates.”

Some two years later, a Second Circuit panel will unanimously reverse Weinstein’s ruling.

Articles You May Like

Do covid vaccines contain nanoparticles that self-assemble to build a biocircuitry “operating system” to control your moods and thoughts?
Democratic senator confronted over membership in elite, all-white beach club: ‘It’s a long tradition’
Kruiser’s (Almost) Daily Distraction: I’m in Love With My New Recliner and I Answer a Question
NOW They Tell Us? NY Times Admits ‘Flawed’ Dem Voting Bill ‘Breathtakingly’ Broad Mess
U.S. to Give Asylum Seekers Rejected under ‘Remain in Mexico’ Policy Second Chance to Apply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *