‘Trillions for Domestic Spending, Not a Cent More for Defense’


I wrote today about the incoherence at the heart of Biden’s China policy:

Joe Biden isn’t known for his austerity, except when it comes to the nation’s defense.

As part of his welcome emphasis on competition with China, the president cajoled reluctant European countries at the G-7 summit into releasing a statement critical of China, on top of the announcement of an infrastructure program meant to counter China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

That’s all fine as far as it goes, but a glaring omission from Biden’s campaign is a defense budget that reflects the growing challenge from Beijing.

Indeed, Biden justifies almost any increased domestic spending as designed to check China’s ambitions, at the same time he neglects what is most needful to keep China from dominating its region and waging war on our allies or perhaps the U.S. itself.

If we can deter China from taking Taiwan with subsidies for electric cars, Biden is inarguably the Churchill of his time.

If we can counter China’s defense buildup with more funding for affordable housing, Biden deserves to take his place beside Alfred Thayer Mahan or George Kennan as a great strategic thinker.

Articles You May Like

Twitter trolls pounce on Steven Crowder tweet announcing that he ‘took a turn for the worse’
Dear Dr. Fauci: If You Are Following the Science, You Owe Us the Data Now
NYT Alleges That Trump Pressured DOJ Declare That the ‘Election Was Corrupt.’ Is It True?
Blacks, Gun Control, and the Second Amendment
NIH Director ‘clarifies’ after comment about parents wearing masks at home to protect unvaccinated kids

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *