The SEC’s Green Name Game

US
Securities and Exchange Commission headquarters in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Kelly/Reuters)
The agency is not — and should not be — in the business of deciding what is good for the environment and society.




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

W
hen considering the prospect of “green” finance, I’m often tempted to burst into song: Green, green, bo-bean, bo-na-na fanna, fo-fean, fee fi mo-mean. Green! Perhaps this can be attributed to my children, who are entranced by the rhymes in Shirley Ellis’s iconic song, “The Name Game.” Yet rather fortuitously, that song can actually help us in thinking about how to name investment products.

While determining what “green” means — or what qualifies as such — is not a new endeavor, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently begun to wrestle with it for investment products. As funds advertising themselves as …

To Read the Full Story

Articles You May Like

When the Washington Post Breaks Out ‘Both-Sidesism’ — Victims of Communism Museum!!
Germany to nationalize struggling energy firm Uniper amid worsening financial crisis
Sunny Hostin claims that Latinos who support the GOP are voting ‘against their own self-interest’
84-year-old pro-life volunteer shot in Michigan after she had a ‘heated’ exchange, anti-abortion group says
Facebook shuts down 100,000-member group for using carrot emoji to refer to covid vaccines, because no discussion of vaccine injuries shall be allowed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.