Closing Arguments today in Oathkeepers Show Trial: One of the Greatest Legal Travesties in US History


As closing arguments start Friday in the Oathkeepers trial, the government has yet to prove defendants Stewart Rhodes, Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson, Jessica Watkins, and Thomas Caldwell engaged in activities beyond misdemeanor trespassing.

FBI Special Agent John Moore recently took the stand as a witness, saying “I don’t know” at least a dozen times in response to the defense’s questions.

Judge Amit Mehta allowed Moore to speculate on Stewart Rhodes’ motives for purchasing the firearms displayed in the courtroom.

You Might Like

When the defense asked Moore whether Rhodes’ gun ownership was legal, Moore said:

TRENDING: UPDATE: Far Left Brazilian Supreme Court Orders Banks to Block Funds of Businessmen Who Supported the Protesters in Mass Democracy Rallies – PROTESTERS STAND STRONG!

“Yeah, it was legal.”

“But in terms of planning to bring civil war to every state capitol, we’re looking at something much bigger.”

Moore proved Rhodes owned the guns but did not state they were even brought to DC on Jan. 6.

Next, he insinuated the dispersion of group members from Washington DC to diverse rural areas after Jan. 6th revealed a conspiracy to overthrow the government.

However, members of the group were texting back and forth, implying they needed a break from the DC area. They wanted to unwind. Rhodes did not tell these individuals where to go. People traveled on their own free will.

Prosecutors are attempting to string together private group chats as evidence of coordination. However, there is no reference or discussion tracing back to a specific criminal behavior.

Is the government making a vague argument and manipulating a few words of “locker room talk” to make a story that doesn’t fit?

This article was originally published on

Investigative journalist has more on the Oath Keeper show trial.

RELATED: Fed Informants Identified during Oathkeepers Trial – Still No Crime Committed – But Corrupt Judge Breaks 6th Amendment and Will Not Allow Defendants to Confront Accusers

In our previous post we identified several likely fed operatives who infiltrated the Oathkeepers and know that no crimes were committed.

Articles You May Like

‘Unwoke With Kevin and Kruiser #54: Disney’s Minor Woke-ectomy and Superheroes of Yore
Is the GOP Underestimating Joe Biden?
DNC TV: ABC, NBC Hype Walker’s Scandals, Ignores Warnock’s Anti-Semitic Ties
Oil exec rips Biden over energy policy, warns of ‘major’ crisis coming in a few weeks
Rock star Morrissey rips into cancel culture, says ‘diversity’ is used to enforce conformity

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *