Starlink: The Good, the Bad, and the Pretty Dang Impressive

News & Politics

Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite-based internet service provider is supposed to revolutionize high-speed access for people with no other options. Or for people who weren’t satisfied with the options they had. Or for weirdos like me who wanted to do one small thing to promote progress.

Earlier today, I found this 12-second video to be instructive.

I can vouch for Starlink being almost wind-proof. Where I live on Colorado’s Front Range, we’ve experienced several days of wind storms with 30-40 mph sustained winds with 85 mph gusts. No internet losses at all.

Allan Hills isn’t exactly the remotest part of Antarctica, but that’s like saying the old Mitchell Brothers O’Farrell Theatre wasn’t the seediest strip club in San Francisco’s Tenderloin district.

You Might Like

Not to get too technical about it, but if it’s prohibitively expensive to lay cable for high-speed internet to sparsely inhabited rural areas in America, imagine what it must cost to bring high-speed internet to the 1,100-4,400 people who inhabit the entire continent of Antarctica.

And I dare say the weather is more pleasant to work in somewhere outside of Grand Island, Neb., than it is anywhere within a few hundred miles of Allan Hills.

But the fact is, it doesn’t cost Starlink anything extra to service the (very) few people there. They just need to launch enough satellites to provide global coverage, which is the company’s business plan, anyway.

What makes Starlink immune to the weather (mostly) is the high-tech transceiver — affectionately known as Dishy McFlatface — and the location of the ISP. I don’t even begin to understand all of the hi-tech built into Dishy, which seamlessly transitions from one Low Earth Orbit satellite to the next. But I’m told that it helps keep the signal fixed even in high winds. And if you live somewhere that has a lot of snow and ice, it’s nice having your ISP located in Texas, which doesn’t.

Just because folks in Allan Hills (and my location on Monument Hill) are delighted to have nearly weather-proof, high-speed internet available doesn’t mean that Starlink isn’t without its problems.

Speed, for one.

I’ve been a Starlink customer for about six months, having waited more than a year between signing up for the company’s beta program and actually getting my transceiver dish delivered and installed.

Installation for most people won’t be a problem. Anyone handy with basic tools can get Dishy mounted and the cable brought inside, no problem. Setting up the router is as simple as can be, using an Android or iPhone app. The router is strictly for consumers who don’t want a lot of settings to fiddle with. For people with large homes, additional routers can be purchased from Starlink to create a “mesh” network with better coverage.

Speeds were very good when mine was first installed, typically 150 megabits downstream to me and 10 or so for uploads. It wasn’t quite Comcast fast, but the monthly cost is considerably less.

That’s changed, however:

Starlink’s median US download speed hit 105Mbps in Q4 2021. It dropped to 90.6Mbps in Q1 2022, 62.5Mbps in Q2 2022, and 53Mbps in the Q3 2022 report released on Wednesday of this week.

Starlink’s median US upload speed dropped from 12Mbps to 7.2Mbps from Q4 2021 to Q3 2022. Median latency rose from 40 ms to 67 ms in the same timeframe.

What’s going on? Simple: Starlink is adding more customers faster than they’re launching new satellites. Something’s gotta give, and it’s speed.

SpaceX (which owns Starlink) is getting those Starlink birds launched just as quickly as they can. The world’s first reusable launch service is also the world’s busiest launch service. The company is on schedule for more than 50 launches this year alone — mostly Starlink sats. By July of this year, SpaceX had already flown more rockets than they did in all of 2021. And in 2021, SpaceX set the previous world record.

Starlink also just got permission to launch a further 7,500 of its second-generation satellites that will bring faster speeds and more throughput.

So it isn’t as though the company has been resting on its laurels.

As happy as I am with Starlink’s service, if you’re someone depend on the 250 megabit or even gigabit internet speeds provided by cable, Starlink might not be for you.

Also for our VIPs: Florida Man Friday: He Was Nearly Transitioned by Gunfire

Articles You May Like

UK Gov Suspends Vax for Healthy Under-50s, Corporate ‘Fact Checkers’ Obfuscate
Kevin McCarthy boots Democrats Schiff and Swalwell from House Intelligence Committee, and they are outraged: ‘Integrity matters more’
Lawmakers push for term limits Constitutional amendment
WEF globalists brag about hackable humans: “We can decode faces in your mind, your PIN number to your bank account”
Air Force General Predicts U.S. Will Be At War With China In 2025: ‘I Hope I Am Wrong’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *