Clinton-Appointed Judge Rejects Trump’s Motion to Dismiss E. Jean Carroll’s Sexual Assault Lawsuit

US

A federal judge on Friday rejected Trump’s motion to dismiss the civil sexual assault suit filed by E. Jean Carroll.

In 2019, E. Jean Carroll alleged Donald Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the 1990’s.

E. Jean Carroll is a mentally unwell woman who previously told CNN she fantasizes about rape.

You Might Like

Trump has denied the allegations and called E. Jean Carroll a “whack job” who’s “not my type.”

TRENDING: JUST IN: Another ‘Twitter Files’ Drop: More Adam Schiff Ban Requests – Twitter “Deamplified” Alleged Conservative Accounts They Say Were Linked to Q-Anon

Carroll filed the lawsuit in November after New York passed the Adult Survivors Act which allows adults to sue over sexual assaults that occurred decades ago.

US District Judge Lewis Kaplan rejected Trump’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit on Friday.

Judge Lewis Kaplan was appointed to the US District of the Southern District of New York by Bill Clinton in 1994.

The Hill reported:

A federal judge rejected former President Trump’s motion to dismiss a civil sexual assault lawsuit that a woman who has accused him of rape in the 1990s filed against him, ruling that the law that authorizes her to sue is allowed under the New York Constitution.

Journalist, author and advice columnist E. Jean Carroll filed her lawsuit against Trump in November after New York’s Adult Survivors Act (ASA), which gives individuals a one-year window to file lawsuits for old sexual misconduct allegations that have passed the statute of limitations, went into effect. She previously also filed a defamation suit against Trump for calling her a liar over her claims that he raped her and for demeaning her physical appearance.

Trump’s legal team argued that the law violates the state constitution’s due process provisions and is therefore unconstitutional. They also argued that Carroll’s defamation case should be dismissed because it does not meet the necessary standard for relief.

But U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that the law is constitutional, citing a ruling from the New York Court of Appeals that the test for if a claim-revival statute violates the state constitution’s due process clause should be whether the statute is “a reasonable measure to address injustice.”

Articles You May Like

The Kruiser Kabana Episode 207: Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene Are My Spirit Animals
Dr. Simone Gold countersues AFLDS board for suing her over claims that she misrepresented herself as group’s head
Florida man caught on viral video beating his dog gets 3-year prison sentence and is forbidden from owning any animals
ADMISSION: Pfizer executive says company is purposely mutating covid through “directed evolution” to keep profit stream flowing; “covid is going to be a cash cow for us”
Woke school district promotes upcoming BLM flag-hoisting event

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *